Date: 26.05.2010.
Time: 9:30 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Abdulla ALAmeri
Subject: Business idea called bankable dream.
Slides: 11
My presentation was good and clear; I explained about the ideas of creating a bank without using a lot of money and the solutions.
The body language was clear. I used my eye contact well. My speech was good and I also didn't use notepaper.
My slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. My body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. I answered the questions well.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
New Log book
Date: 23.05.2010.
Time: 10:40. AM
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Abdulla Masoud
Subject: Extension of animals.
Slides: 13
The presentation was clear; Abdulla explained his ideas of hunting in the world.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact perfectly. His talking was quite good and he also used notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Abdulla explained the problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear but the grammatical mistakes were a lot.
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 1:00. PM
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Saoud Abdulla
Subject: Crimes In Dubai.
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear. Saoud explained the crimes in the UAE and discussed its problems and solutions. His body language good and
He used eye contact perfectly. Although he didn't used notepaper his explanation was good.
The slides were colored and clear. The presentation was relevant to the speech.
The body language was quite good and the grammatical mistakes were few.
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 1:25. PM
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohammed Alzabi
Subject: Issue of Obesity.
Slides: 14
The presentation was clear. Mohammed talked about how obesity is affected by lifestyle. His body language was good and he used his body language well. He didn’t use notepaper. The slides were clear and full of relevant pictures. There was little text written in the presentation. The slides were colorful and clear. The grammatical mistakes were few whereas the body language was good.
Date: 23.05.2010.
Time: 1:40. Pm
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Fahad Almosabi
Subject: Recycling Tires
Slides:11
The presentation was clear; Fahad explained his ideas of recycling tires.
The body language was clear; he used his eye contact perfectly and clearly. His speech was good he and he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Fahad explained the tires problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear and grammatical mistakes were few.Fahad answered the questions well.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 8:30. Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohmmed ALHmadi
Subject: Population in Dhabi.
Slides:10
The presentation was clear; Mohammed explained his ideas about the population in Dubai.
The body language was and clear he used his eye contact well and clearly. His speech was goodand also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Mohammed explained the population in Dhabi problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Mohammed answered the questions well as the teacher said.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 8:46. Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: AlMonther
Subject: divorcing in UAE.
Slides:9
The presentation was clear; ALMonther explained briefly about divorce after getting married in the UAE.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. ALmonther explained the divorce in the UAE problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Mohammed answered the questions well, as the teacher said.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 9:5. Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Ahmed ALMnsoori
Subject: Soft drinks.
Slides:9
The presentation was not very clear; Ahmed explained about soft drinks and the solution of soft drinks and problems.
The body language was clear he and used his eye contact well. His speech was good and also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Ahmed's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Ahmed answered the questions well.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 9:20 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Rashid AlMnhali.
Subject: Egypt.
Slides: 10
The presentation was clear; Rashid explained about Egypt's problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Rashid's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Rashid answered the questions well.
Date:25.05.2010.
Time: 10:20 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Feisal Aldahri
Subject: Junk food
Slides: 13
The presentation was clear; Feisal explained about junk food and its problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Feisal The body language was clear and grammatical were few. Feisal answered the questions well .
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 10:40 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohmmed Alramsi
Subject: Hacker.
Slides: 10
The presentation was clear; Mohammed explained about hackers and what they did in real life and what is their problems and their solutions.
The body language was clear; he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Mohammed's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Mohammed answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions.
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 12:32 Pm.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Ahmed AlBraiky
Subject: Conjunction in the UAE
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Ahmed explained about traffic conjunction in the UAE and its problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Ahmed's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Ahmed answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially form the teacher.
Date: 27.05.2010.
Time: 8:30 AM.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohsin Mohammed
Subject: Recycling paper
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Mohsin explained about how paper can be recycled and the steps of recycling.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Mohsin body language was clear and grammatical were few. Mohsin answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions especially from the teacher.
Date: 26.05.2010.
Time: 8:45 Pm.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Abdulrahman bin Zaid
Subject: Problems of Smoking
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Abdurrahman explained about smoking and the problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Abdulrahman body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Abdurrahman answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the audience.
Date: 27.05.2010.
Time: 8:55 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Salem almzrooi
Subject: Water conversation.
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Salem explained about the water build environment.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Salem;s body language was clear and grammatical were few. Salam answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the teacher.
Date: 27.05.2010.
Time: 9:15 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Sultan almrzooqi
Subject: Global warming.
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; he clearly explained about the water environment.
The body language was clear he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good and but the problem was he used notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Sultan's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Sultan answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the teacher.
Date: 29.05.2010.
Time: 11:00 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Saif Alkhaili
Subject: Global Polution
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear;he clearly explained about global pollution and explained what it in air and water.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good he but the problem was he used notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Saif's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Saif answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the teacher.
Time: 10:40. AM
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Abdulla Masoud
Subject: Extension of animals.
Slides: 13
The presentation was clear; Abdulla explained his ideas of hunting in the world.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact perfectly. His talking was quite good and he also used notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Abdulla explained the problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear but the grammatical mistakes were a lot.
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 1:00. PM
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Saoud Abdulla
Subject: Crimes In Dubai.
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear. Saoud explained the crimes in the UAE and discussed its problems and solutions. His body language good and
He used eye contact perfectly. Although he didn't used notepaper his explanation was good.
The slides were colored and clear. The presentation was relevant to the speech.
The body language was quite good and the grammatical mistakes were few.
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 1:25. PM
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohammed Alzabi
Subject: Issue of Obesity.
Slides: 14
The presentation was clear. Mohammed talked about how obesity is affected by lifestyle. His body language was good and he used his body language well. He didn’t use notepaper. The slides were clear and full of relevant pictures. There was little text written in the presentation. The slides were colorful and clear. The grammatical mistakes were few whereas the body language was good.
Date: 23.05.2010.
Time: 1:40. Pm
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Fahad Almosabi
Subject: Recycling Tires
Slides:11
The presentation was clear; Fahad explained his ideas of recycling tires.
The body language was clear; he used his eye contact perfectly and clearly. His speech was good he and he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Fahad explained the tires problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear and grammatical mistakes were few.Fahad answered the questions well.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 8:30. Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohmmed ALHmadi
Subject: Population in Dhabi.
Slides:10
The presentation was clear; Mohammed explained his ideas about the population in Dubai.
The body language was and clear he used his eye contact well and clearly. His speech was goodand also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Mohammed explained the population in Dhabi problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Mohammed answered the questions well as the teacher said.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 8:46. Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: AlMonther
Subject: divorcing in UAE.
Slides:9
The presentation was clear; ALMonther explained briefly about divorce after getting married in the UAE.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. ALmonther explained the divorce in the UAE problems and the solutions clearly.
The body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Mohammed answered the questions well, as the teacher said.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 9:5. Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Ahmed ALMnsoori
Subject: Soft drinks.
Slides:9
The presentation was not very clear; Ahmed explained about soft drinks and the solution of soft drinks and problems.
The body language was clear he and used his eye contact well. His speech was good and also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Ahmed's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Ahmed answered the questions well.
Date: 24.05.2010.
Time: 9:20 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Rashid AlMnhali.
Subject: Egypt.
Slides: 10
The presentation was clear; Rashid explained about Egypt's problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Rashid's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Rashid answered the questions well.
Date:25.05.2010.
Time: 10:20 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Feisal Aldahri
Subject: Junk food
Slides: 13
The presentation was clear; Feisal explained about junk food and its problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Feisal The body language was clear and grammatical were few. Feisal answered the questions well .
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 10:40 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohmmed Alramsi
Subject: Hacker.
Slides: 10
The presentation was clear; Mohammed explained about hackers and what they did in real life and what is their problems and their solutions.
The body language was clear; he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Mohammed's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Mohammed answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions.
Date: 25.05.2010.
Time: 12:32 Pm.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Ahmed AlBraiky
Subject: Conjunction in the UAE
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Ahmed explained about traffic conjunction in the UAE and its problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Ahmed's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Ahmed answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially form the teacher.
Date: 27.05.2010.
Time: 8:30 AM.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Mohsin Mohammed
Subject: Recycling paper
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Mohsin explained about how paper can be recycled and the steps of recycling.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Mohsin body language was clear and grammatical were few. Mohsin answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions especially from the teacher.
Date: 26.05.2010.
Time: 8:45 Pm.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Abdulrahman bin Zaid
Subject: Problems of Smoking
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Abdurrahman explained about smoking and the problems and solutions.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Abdulrahman body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Abdurrahman answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the audience.
Date: 27.05.2010.
Time: 8:55 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Salem almzrooi
Subject: Water conversation.
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; Salem explained about the water build environment.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good and he also he didn't use notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Salem;s body language was clear and grammatical were few. Salam answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the teacher.
Date: 27.05.2010.
Time: 9:15 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Sultan almrzooqi
Subject: Global warming.
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear; he clearly explained about the water environment.
The body language was clear he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good and but the problem was he used notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Sultan's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Sultan answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the teacher.
Date: 29.05.2010.
Time: 11:00 Am.
Venue: F52.
Presenter: Saif Alkhaili
Subject: Global Polution
Slides: 11
The presentation was clear;he clearly explained about global pollution and explained what it in air and water.
The body language was clear and he used his eye contact well. His speech was quite good he but the problem was he used notepaper.
The slides were colorful, clear, and relevant to the presentation. Saif's body language was clear and grammatical errors were few. Saif answered the questions well and there were a lot of questions specially from the teacher.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Log book for Fahad H00130970 & Mohd Hassan H00132994
Date; 11.04.2010
Time: 1100
Location: F52
Presenters: Fahad H00130970 & Mohd Hassan H00132994
Subject: Recycling Process.
Slides:10.
Slides were colorful & informative. Mohd Hassan had a tendency to read the wording on the slides.
The slides were very good. The slides were colorful and had useful meanings. Fahad and Mohammed used eye contact very well. Moreover they didn't use notepaper. They spoke coherently and fast.
Body language: Fahad and Mohammed talked directly to the audience.
Their English was clear to understand. There were many questions in the presentation. The presentation was clear and interesting.
Time: 1100
Location: F52
Presenters: Fahad H00130970 & Mohd Hassan H00132994
Subject: Recycling Process.
Slides:10.
Slides were colorful & informative. Mohd Hassan had a tendency to read the wording on the slides.
The slides were very good. The slides were colorful and had useful meanings. Fahad and Mohammed used eye contact very well. Moreover they didn't use notepaper. They spoke coherently and fast.
Body language: Fahad and Mohammed talked directly to the audience.
Their English was clear to understand. There were many questions in the presentation. The presentation was clear and interesting.
Log book for Saood H00131022 & Mohd Saleh H00128186
Date: 13.04.2010.
Time: 12:35.
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Saood H00131022 & Mohd Saleh H00128186
Subject: The UAE in the past.
Slides: 8.
The slides were quite good. The slides were colorful and had useful meanings. Saood and Mohammed used eye contact very well. Moreover they didn't use notepaper.
Body language: Saood and Mohammed talked directly to the audience.
Their English was difficult to understand. There were many questions, especially in this presentation. The presentation was clear and interesting.
Time: 12:35.
Venue: F52.
Presenters: Saood H00131022 & Mohd Saleh H00128186
Subject: The UAE in the past.
Slides: 8.
The slides were quite good. The slides were colorful and had useful meanings. Saood and Mohammed used eye contact very well. Moreover they didn't use notepaper.
Body language: Saood and Mohammed talked directly to the audience.
Their English was difficult to understand. There were many questions, especially in this presentation. The presentation was clear and interesting.
Vocabulary meaning
Despite: Prep. In spite of; notwithstanding.
He was tolerant despite his background and education.
Ethnic: Adj. Different racial and social groups; of people from different countries.
The tourists watched the ethnic dancing.
Prior: Adj. Previous, earlier, preceding, antecedent, former
A prior agreement prevents me from accepting this.
Debate: Verb. Discuss or argue about.
When we left, the men were still debating.
Subsequent:Adj. succeeding, following, ensuing, happening after.
Subsequent to their arrival in Chicago, they bought a new car.
Implement:
noun. A tool, utensil, or other piece of equipment.
We used garden implements to dig the sand.
Correspondence: noun. Exchange of letters; agreement; similarity .
There is some correspondence between the two parties.
Constrained: Adj. restricted; forced; artificial, unnatural.
His life had been constrained by habit to the same few activities and friends.
Emphasizes: Verb. make more obviously defined?
The teacher emphasized the importance of the project.
Immigrants: noun. A person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country.
Those Immigrants are hard workers.
Outcome: noun. consequence, net result, upshot, after-effect, aftermath, conclusion, issue, end (product).
The outcome of the energy is to help you to play a lot.
Scheme: Verb. Plan, devise, plot; intrigue, conspire, contrive
Arrange according to a colour scheme.
Minority: noun. Smaller group as opposed to the majority; part of a population differing in some characteristic (race, sex, etc.); state of being under legal age.
Only a minority of the people live in the countryside.
Interactions: noun. reciprocal action or influence.
A lot of interactions happen between teachers and students.
Valid: actually supporting the intended point or claim.
He has a valid passport.
Convened: Verb. Come or bring together for a meeting or activity.
. He convened a secret meeting
Deduce: Verb. Arrive at (a fact or a conclusion) by reasoning.
I can't deduce this game?
Framework: Noun. An essential supporting or underlying structure.
The building will be made of concrete on a steel framework.
Dominated: Verb. have a commanding or controlling influence over.
The Russians dominated Iran in the nineteenth century.
Negated: Verb. Deny; refute, rebut, prove something wrong; neutralize; contradict.
He negates the political nature of education.
Sequential: Adj. characterized by a regular sequence, serial; successive, following, subsequent, consecutive.
The course assessments are sequential.
He was tolerant despite his background and education.
Ethnic: Adj. Different racial and social groups; of people from different countries.
The tourists watched the ethnic dancing.
Prior: Adj. Previous, earlier, preceding, antecedent, former
A prior agreement prevents me from accepting this.
Debate: Verb. Discuss or argue about.
When we left, the men were still debating.
Subsequent:Adj. succeeding, following, ensuing, happening after.
Subsequent to their arrival in Chicago, they bought a new car.
Implement:
noun. A tool, utensil, or other piece of equipment.
We used garden implements to dig the sand.
Correspondence: noun. Exchange of letters; agreement; similarity .
There is some correspondence between the two parties.
Constrained: Adj. restricted; forced; artificial, unnatural.
His life had been constrained by habit to the same few activities and friends.
Emphasizes: Verb. make more obviously defined?
The teacher emphasized the importance of the project.
Immigrants: noun. A person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country.
Those Immigrants are hard workers.
Outcome: noun. consequence, net result, upshot, after-effect, aftermath, conclusion, issue, end (product).
The outcome of the energy is to help you to play a lot.
Scheme: Verb. Plan, devise, plot; intrigue, conspire, contrive
Arrange according to a colour scheme.
Minority: noun. Smaller group as opposed to the majority; part of a population differing in some characteristic (race, sex, etc.); state of being under legal age.
Only a minority of the people live in the countryside.
Interactions: noun. reciprocal action or influence.
A lot of interactions happen between teachers and students.
Valid: actually supporting the intended point or claim.
He has a valid passport.
Convened: Verb. Come or bring together for a meeting or activity.
. He convened a secret meeting
Deduce: Verb. Arrive at (a fact or a conclusion) by reasoning.
I can't deduce this game?
Framework: Noun. An essential supporting or underlying structure.
The building will be made of concrete on a steel framework.
Dominated: Verb. have a commanding or controlling influence over.
The Russians dominated Iran in the nineteenth century.
Negated: Verb. Deny; refute, rebut, prove something wrong; neutralize; contradict.
He negates the political nature of education.
Sequential: Adj. characterized by a regular sequence, serial; successive, following, subsequent, consecutive.
The course assessments are sequential.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Log book for Mohammed Al Zabi and Sultan Almrzooqi
Date: 11.4.2010.
Time: 12:55 PM.
Venue: F25.
Presenters: Mohammed Al Zabi and Sultan Almrzooqi showed
Subject: Starting a new business.
Slides: 10.
Mohammed and Sultan showed 10 slides. Their presentation was about starting a new business. They talked about spending money and saving money. Also there are several steps for starting a new business. Mohammed said an important point is that a businessman's first loss is because he doesn't have experience in his business and after trying he may succeed in his business. Their slides were colorful, informative and interesting. They used written content.
Body language: Mohammed and Sultan talked directly to the audience.
They used notepaper. They used eye contact well. Their English was difficult to understand. There were many questions such as, what is the meaning of entrepreneur and they tried hard to find it but they couldn’t. The presentation was clear and interesting.
Time: 12:55 PM.
Venue: F25.
Presenters: Mohammed Al Zabi and Sultan Almrzooqi showed
Subject: Starting a new business.
Slides: 10.
Mohammed and Sultan showed 10 slides. Their presentation was about starting a new business. They talked about spending money and saving money. Also there are several steps for starting a new business. Mohammed said an important point is that a businessman's first loss is because he doesn't have experience in his business and after trying he may succeed in his business. Their slides were colorful, informative and interesting. They used written content.
Body language: Mohammed and Sultan talked directly to the audience.
They used notepaper. They used eye contact well. Their English was difficult to understand. There were many questions such as, what is the meaning of entrepreneur and they tried hard to find it but they couldn’t. The presentation was clear and interesting.
Log book Feisal Al Dhari and Saif Al Khiali
Date: 11.4.2010.
Time: 12:10 PM.
Venue: F25.
Presenters: Feisal Al Dhari and Saif Al Khiali
Subject: UAE in the past.
Slides:
Feisal and Saif showed 15 slides about the UAE in the past. The pictures contained much information and black and white pictures because there were old pictures. The pictures were about: first Oil Company, fishing activities and samples of living. Faisal and Saif shared the work by dividing slides between them. Saif talked first and Faisal ended the presentation. The slides were not colorful because they were black and white. Information on the slides was too much but the presentation was good.
Body language: Feisal and Saif talked directly to the audience. They used note paper and they used it for a few minutes. They used eye contact very well. Their English was very good. There were many comments and questions. Saif and Feisal answered the questions together. The presentation was clear and obvious to the audience.
Time: 12:10 PM.
Venue: F25.
Presenters: Feisal Al Dhari and Saif Al Khiali
Subject: UAE in the past.
Slides:
Feisal and Saif showed 15 slides about the UAE in the past. The pictures contained much information and black and white pictures because there were old pictures. The pictures were about: first Oil Company, fishing activities and samples of living. Faisal and Saif shared the work by dividing slides between them. Saif talked first and Faisal ended the presentation. The slides were not colorful because they were black and white. Information on the slides was too much but the presentation was good.
Body language: Feisal and Saif talked directly to the audience. They used note paper and they used it for a few minutes. They used eye contact very well. Their English was very good. There were many comments and questions. Saif and Feisal answered the questions together. The presentation was clear and obvious to the audience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)